Some cool buy car images:
These are useful by me!:child nutrition program.news book blog: car surface Preparation.
Refinement :
Can Someone Buy Me This Car?
Image by Vatsek
I want this car. Can someone buy it for me, please?
Welcome to my website:car accessories shop.In the blog: car surface Preparation.
Wonderful buy car:
Best Buy Car Show
Image by PB-PSBear
Car show
Thank you for your attention:car accessories shop.news book blog: car accessories.
Refinement :
You wouldn’t buy our shitty cars
Image by netzkobold
So we’ll be taking your money anyway.
The Bailout. Coming this January.
You probably thought it was smart to buy a foreign import of superior quality, with better mileage and resale value. Maybe you even thought that years of market share loss might prod us into rethinking our process and redesigning our products with better quality in mind. But you forgot one thing: we spend a shitload of money on lobbyists. So now you’re out billion, plus the cost of your subaru. Maybe next time you’ll buy American like a real man. Either way, we’re cool.
We’re the big three. We don’t need to compete.
These are useful by me!:car accessories shop.news book blog: car accessories .NEW YORK (TheStreet) — The rally in shares of car and truck suppliers such as Visteon, BorgWarner and Navistar will continue along with the economic recovery, says Ragen Steinke, manager of the WHG SMidCap Fund. The $ 455 million mutual fund has returned 27% over the past year, putting it in Morningstar’s 36th percentile for mid-cap blend funds, which buy both growth and value shares. Over the …
Read more on3 Car-Parts Companies to Extend Rally
Yeah, I want this baby.
Vatsek
Could you please grant permission to use your (fabulous!) poster over at Wikipedia? You would need to relicense it as Cretive Commons Attribution Share-alike to meet WP’s copyright requirements. Write if you have questions — pdtillman[at]gmail[dot]com
Thanks in advance — and thanks for a great image!
Cheers, Pete Tillman, who hasn’t owned a Detroit auto in 30 years
Great image or not, it’s blatantly false when it comes to Ford. Ford was not part of the federal loans offered to GM and Chrysler by the White House earlier this month. Ford’s official statement can be found at: media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=29604
Scott Monty
Global Digital Communications
Ford Motor Company
Sorry, Scott. This parody may be an oversimplification in regards to Ford, but it is not blatantly false. True, Ford is not receiving a loan from the initial emergency bailout. However, it is hoping for a $9 billion dollar line of credit in the second, long-term bailout package. Secondly, it does receive indirect benefit from the now $23 billion in emergency bailout funds received by GM and Chrysler. Much of this money will go to pay the large network of independent parts manufacturers that supply all 3 US automakers. This network could not survive if it had to depend on payments from Ford alone. Ford’s ability to continue would be seriously compromised.
I’m with you Scott – the fact that GM and Chrysler would drive Ford’s suppliers out of business doesn’t indicate anything about Ford’s ability to manage their company. Also, the line of credit is strictly reliant upon the other automaker’s ability (or lack thereof) to succeed. i.e. if GM and Chrysler had their stuff together, the goverment wouldn’t have heard peep 1 out of Ford. It’s refreshing to see a domestic top Toyota’s initial quality numbers and stay there. Keep up the outstanding work Ford!!
I certainly would like to thank ford for not taking our money yet, but you have to admit that cars like the "focus" and "windstar" pretty much personify "shitty detroit cars"
Wow, funny that Ford’s quality has only been on teh rise and equals Toyota’s and Honda’s. Toyota and Honda are not receiving any money since they are not US companies, but they are not doing well either. It is an independent group in Detroit, I realize, but it is a fact based survey. Personally, I have had 3 fords go over 200K miles and my toyota blew up, literaly, and my acura died at 168k. So go justify paying more per mile in general ownership of your toyota/honda and enjoy a less steep decline in value over the first years of the vehicle,and I will continue to drive cheaper per mile used american vehicles.
njection.com/blogs/autoblog/archive/2008/04/07/ford-touti…
At first I loved the image and message, but then I noticed the Ford logo. Had the artist done his/her homework, they’d not have included Ford (which hasn’t taken nor asked for government cheese, and which has many products highly Recommended by Consumer Reports). Agree with Scott Monty – the message is blatantly false, and because of that needs a complete rework. Ford’s done the right thing – if anything, Americans should be standing up with that company and buying Ford cars. They’re reliable (ask Consumer Reports, or somebody that owns one!) and come from a great American company that lives American values.
I grew up with a ’78 Granada (new), an ’82 Granada (used), an ’84 Courier (used), an ’89 Taurus (new), a ’93 Taurus (new), and a ’99 Ranger (new). We drove the ’78 into the ground, it was great, built like a tank. The ’82 as well, drove it into the ground. Loved the Courier. Both Tauruses had major problems WAY earlier than they should have. We noticed the quality downgrade a LOT between the two Tauruses, from the thinner upholstery fabric and less-comfortable seats to the whining transmission. The Ranger had to have its manual transmission rebuilt at 15K. I bought a Corolla and my brother bought a Civic, and my parents learned a lot during the shopping experience. They now have a Honda CR-V and a Camry and are enjoying the mileage, winter reliability, less maintenance, and less frustration for my dad.
Couple things: This image was taken from buffalobeast.com, and it was made before it became clear that Ford would not be taking bailout $$